Blog

When AI Misfires: The Human Toll of Faulty AI Writing Detectors

It’s no secret that I’m a proponent of AI as a useful tool for creatives. But, as with any new tool, there are huge downsides that accompany the limitless upside potential. This is especially true in these early days of AI adoption as individuals and companies struggle to learn how best to implement these tools into their workflows. One of the most significant downsides we’re seeing right now involves AI detectors mistakenly flagging human-written articles as being AI-generated, which is causing real harm to writers’ careers.

Consider one of the major factors leading to some of these false flags: the use of Grammarly, a widely-used tool for fixing punctuation and grammar mistakes. Grammarly helps make writing clearer and free of errors, which is essential for professional work. However, this polished writing can sometimes look like it was created by AI, causing AI detectors to flag it. So, writers who try to improve their work may end up having their work flagged as being created using AI. This issue is especially frustrating because many companies actually require their employees to use Grammarly to clean up their work.

“AI trains on millions of human-written articles. AI gets really good at imitating human writing. AI thinks everything is AI.”

David Puddy the 2nd – Gizmodo Commenter

AI detectors are not very reliable, which is a big problem given what’s at stake. Bars Juhasz, speaking with Gizmodo, pointed out these concerns: “We have a lot of concerns around the reliability of the training process these AI detectors use. These guys are claiming they have 99% accuracy, and based on our work, I think that’s impossible. But even if it’s true, that still means for every 100 people there’s going to be one false flag. We’re talking about people’s livelihoods and their reputations.”

For writers, being wrongly accused of using AI can have serious consequences. Many writers depend on their reputation for original work to get jobs and keep steady work. If their work gets flagged, they can lose opportunities, damage their reputations, and even lose their jobs. Freelance writers and those working on strict contracts are especially at risk because clients may decide to end agreements rather than risk publishing something that might be AI-generated.

On top of the financial hit, these false flags also take a toll on writers’ mental health. Writers put a lot of time, creativity, and effort into their work. Being wrongly accused of using AI undermines their skills and dedication, sometimes tarnishing a career that took years to build. This can lead to lower motivation and increased stress, which hurts their productivity and well-being.

AI is here to stay, and it should be seen as a helpful tool, not something to be feared. Some of the biggest companies in the world also recognize the potential of AI and are making significant investments to integrate AI into their products. Microsoft and Google heavily invest in AI technologies to enhance their software and services. Similarly, Adobe has introduced AI tools into its Creative Suite to help artists be more effective, allowing for enhanced creativity and productivity. It seems hypocritical to provide and encourage AI tools for graphic artists, but make the use of AI tools a taboo for those whose creative interests tend to be more lexical. Instead of punishing employees based on dubious results from AI detectors, companies should help their employees use AI responsibly. By providing training and clear guidelines on ethical AI use, companies can empower writers to improve their work without fear of being made a pariah.

Boiled down to its core, the basic idea of AI being able to detect other AI-generated content seems questionable. As one Gizmodo commenter put it, “AI trains on millions of human-written articles. AI gets really good at imitating human writing. AI thinks everything is AI.” This shows the flaws in current AI detection methods.

There may never be an AI detection tool that’s infallible, and employers should question whether using these tools to make crucial employment decisions is really the best path forward. Instead it should be the quality of the work being produced that should be examined, regardless of the tools being used to create it.

Writers need to stand up for themselves and each other. The writing community needs to raise awareness about this issue and push for improvements in AI detectors. By working together with tech companies and industry groups, we can create are more effective environment that embraces AI as a tool that makes all of our lives easier.

After all, AI really can be a great tool for writers, helping them enhance their work. But the risk of false accusations by AI detectors is a serious threat. By recognizing this problem and working on better solutions, we can ensure that human writers are appreciated and valued for their contributions.

The Washington Post’s AI Expansion: A Risky Move in Troubled Times

In the wake of a significant financial loss, the Washington Post is making headlines for a bold new strategy: expanding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in its newsroom. After reporting a $77 million loss, the media giant is turning to AI in hopes of streamlining operations and reducing costs. However, this move raises critical questions about the future of journalism and the potential consequences of replacing human writers with machines.

The Washington Post’s Chief Technology Officer, in a recent statement, encapsulated the organization’s new direction: “The way I see us operate is we have A.I. everywhere. We have A.I. in our newsroom; we have A.I. with our consumers; we have A.I. in the business.” This comprehensive integration of AI reflects a broader trend in the industry, where technology is increasingly being leveraged to enhance efficiency and productivity.

“The way I see us operate is we have A.I. everywhere. We have A.I. in our newsroom; we have A.I. with our consumers; we have A.I. in the business.”

Vineet Khosla, Washington Post CTO

The strategy seems innovative on the surface. AI can assist in various aspects of news production, from generating quick updates and automating routine tasks to analyzing vast amounts of data for investigative pieces. Yet, there is a fine line between using AI as a tool to aid human journalists and allowing it to replace them.

The primary concern with the Washington Post’s approach is the potential for AI to supplant human creativity, intuition, and critical thinking—qualities that are the bedrock of quality journalism. While AI can process information and generate text at an unprecedented speed, it lacks the nuanced understanding and ethical considerations that human writers bring to their work. The risk here is that news becomes more about quantity than quality, leading to a decline in the depth and integrity of reporting.

The move to replace human writers with AI can undermine the trust between the publication and its readership. Readers expect and deserve well-researched, thoughtfully crafted stories that reflect the complexities of the world around them. A shift towards AI-generated content could erode this trust, as the subtle biases and errors inherent in AI algorithms become more apparent.

In addition to these concerns, expanding AI might not help the Washington Post’s credibility. In 2022, 48 percent of respondents believed the publication to be very or somewhat credible. This level of trust is significant in a media landscape where credibility is constantly scrutinized. Introducing AI-generated content could jeopardize this credibility, as readers may question the authenticity and reliability of AI-driven stories. The perception that news is produced by machines rather than experienced journalists could lead to skepticism and diminished trust.

The impact on newsroom staff cannot be ignored. Journalists facing the threat of redundancy may find their morale and motivation plummeting, which can further degrade the quality of the content being produced. The human element of journalism—built on passion, curiosity, and a commitment to truth—is irreplaceable. AI should be seen as a supportive tool, enhancing the capabilities of journalists rather than rendering them obsolete.

The Washington Post’s financial struggles are indeed a pressing issue, but turning to AI as a panacea might create more problems than it solves. Instead of viewing AI as a replacement, it should be integrated in a way that supports and augments the work of human journalists. This balanced approach can ensure that the publication continues to produce high-quality journalism while also benefiting from the efficiencies that AI can offer.

The Washington Post’s decision to expand AI in its newsroom amidst significant financial losses is a gamble. While AI can undoubtedly bring benefits, it should be implemented as a complement to human effort, not a substitute. The future of journalism depends on maintaining the delicate balance between leveraging technology and preserving the irreplaceable qualities that human journalists contribute to their craft. As the industry evolves, this balance will be crucial in ensuring that journalism continues to serve the public good with integrity and depth.

The Challenges of Predicting the Future of AI: ChatGPT and Beyond

When OpenAI unleashed ChatGPT onto the world in November 2022, it felt like a seismic shift in the landscape of artificial intelligence. This conversational AI, built on the GPT-3.5 architecture, showcased an unprecedented ability to understand and generate human-like text, setting a new standard for what AI could achieve. But as awe-inspiring as these advancements are, predicting the future trajectory of AI remains a Herculean task, laden with uncertainties and unexpected turns.

The Rapid Evolution of AI

ChatGPT’s debut was a pivotal moment, not just for AI enthusiasts but for the broader tech industry. In the months and years following its release, AI technology has continued to accelerate at a blistering pace. From significant strides in natural language processing to breakthroughs in computer vision and autonomous systems, AI is advancing faster than many could have imagined.

Why AI Predictions Are So Tough

The primary challenge in forecasting AI’s future is the dizzying speed of technological progress. Innovations are emerging so rapidly that even the most forward-thinking experts struggle to keep up. Moreover, AI development is a melting pot of various disciplines—hardware, software, data science, and ethics—all of which evolve in tandem and influence each other in unpredictable ways.

A Look Back: Tom Scott’s 2012 Prediction

To appreciate the difficulty of predicting tech trends, it’s helpful to revisit past forecasts. In 2012, YouTuber and technologist Tom Scott took a stab at predicting what the world would look like in 2022. While his predictions were insightful, he, like many others, missed some of the most significant changes.

Among other misses, and despite some of the first signs of the change already being felt, Scott did not foresee the mobile-first revolution and the sweeping shift from dedicated web pages and applications to mobile apps.

In 2012, after I’d spent more than a decade writing websites on and for desktop computers, I’d just missed that entirely. That transition was starting—just starting—and I hadn’t spotted it.

Tom Scott reflecting on his prediction oversight.

The explosion of smartphone use and the dominance of mobile apps have revolutionized user behavior, business strategies, and social interactions. This gap in prediction underscores just how challenging it is to foresee which technologies will gain traction and transform our daily lives.

The Uncharted Territory of AI’s Future

AI’s future is a vast, uncharted territory. While we can speculate about potential advancements—like more sophisticated language models, improved machine learning algorithms, and deeper AI integration across industries—the precise path is anything but clear. Factors such as regulatory changes, ethical considerations, and unexpected technological breakthroughs will all play crucial roles in determining AI’s trajectory.

The societal impact of AI, including its influence on employment, privacy, and decision-making, adds yet another layer of complexity. The ethical and philosophical questions that AI raises are profound and constantly evolving, making it even more difficult to predict the full extent of its future impact.

My Prediction

Now that I’ve laid out why it’s not necessarily a great idea to predict what the future of AI could look like, I’m going to throw my prognosticator hat into the ring and make a prediction of my own.

Looking ahead, I predict that AI will become another indispensable tool in the creative workbelt, much like Photoshop did in the early ’90s. AI will assist creators across various disciplines, enhancing their productivity and expanding their creative possibilities. This transformation will make AI a ubiquitous presence in creative industries, driving innovation and efficiency.

However, I foresee that the most popular application of AI will be as a personal assistant capable of handling a wide array of tasks. From sifting through your email archive for a specific attachment to making restaurant reservations on your behalf, AI will become an integral part of our daily routines. Companies like Google have already demonstrated some of these capabilities, and I believe this will become the most commonplace use of AI within the next 5-10 years.

Embracing the Unknown

As we gaze into the future of AI, embracing uncertainty becomes essential. The rapid pace of technological change demands continuous learning and adaptability. Instead of trying to pin down exact predictions, we should prepare for a range of possibilities and cultivate a mindset that can navigate the unknown.

In the end, the challenge of predicting AI’s future lies in its rapid evolution, interdisciplinary nature, and the sweeping societal changes it brings. Reflecting on past predictions, like those of Tom Scott, highlights the unpredictability of technological advancement. The best approach is to stay open-minded and flexible, ready to adapt to whatever surprises the future holds. As AI continues to advance, so too must our understanding and anticipation of its potential, ensuring that we remain active participants in shaping the future of this transformative technology.

Harnessing the Power of AI in 3D Printing: A Game-Changer for Enthusiasts

As a 3D printing enthusiast who has tinkered and tweaked everything from a trusty Creality Ender 3 to a high-resolution Photon Mono X2 resin printer, I’ve seen my fair share of technological advancements in 3D printing. However, nothing has quite excited me as much as the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into this space. The ability of AI to generate 3D printable models from simple text prompts or images is transforming our hobby and profession in unimaginable ways. Here’s a dive into how AI is reshaping the landscape of 3D printing and what it means for enthusiasts like us.

Instant 3D Model Generation: From Concept to Reality

Imagine the scenario where you need to replace a broken gear in an old clock or want to create a unique set of bookends. Traditionally, this task would involve either a lengthy search for an exact model online or countless hours spent designing one from scratch using complex CAD software. The advent of AI in 3D printing has revolutionized this dynamic, offering a more efficient and accessible approach.

With innovative tools like Stability AI’s image-to-3D and the Meshy generator, along with other powerful platforms like OpenAI’s DALL-E and Google’s DreamBooth, the process has been simplified dramatically. Users can now input simple text descriptions or upload images of the item they need or envision. These AI systems then leverage advanced algorithms to interpret the inputs and generate detailed, accurate 3D models that are ready for printing.

For instance, if you wanted a gear with a specific set of teeth or a bookend shaped like a mythical creature, you could describe these details in text or provide a drawing. The AI would process this information and create a 3D model that not only meets the specified criteria but is also optimized for 3D printing. This means considering factors such as structural integrity, the balance of weight, and the most effective orientation for printing.

The capabilities of these AI tools extend beyond simple model generation. They incorporate learning from vast databases of existing 3D models, which allows them to suggest optimizations and improvements that might not be immediately obvious even to experienced designers. This can include adjustments to the thickness of materials to ensure durability without wasting resources or altering aesthetic elements to achieve better symmetry or visual appeal.

This streamlined approach to model creation not only cuts down on the time required for design but also democratizes access to personalized prototyping. Whether for professional designers, hobbyists, or even novices to 3D printing, AI-generated models remove significant barriers to entry. Now, anyone with a basic understanding of the desired object can move quickly from concept to creation, opening up a world of possibilities for custom fabrication and personal projects. By reducing the technical skills needed for model design, AI is making 3D printing more inclusive and expanding the creative horizons for all users.

Looking Ahead: The Future of 3D Printing Powered by AI

As we look towards the future, the possibilities of AI in 3D printing are boundless. We are entering a phase where mixed reality tools might allow us to interact with and modify 3D models in real-time using AI suggestions, further blending the digital and physical crafting worlds.

For us enthusiasts, embracing AI tools means staying at the forefront of technology while enriching our creative expression. Whether it’s crafting replacement parts, bespoke artwork, or functional household items, AI is proving to be an indispensable ally in the evolution of 3D printing.

As someone deeply embedded in the world of 3D printing, the possibilities that AI can introduce into the hobby are nothing short of revolutionary. It not only promises to streamline the design-to-print process but also enhance our ability to innovate and personalize like never before. For hobbyists and professionals alike, AI in 3D printing is not just a tool—it’s a transformation that invites us to reimagine the limits of what we can create. So, let’s continue to explore this brave new world of limitless possibilities, one layer at a time.

AI’s Creative Takeover: Navigating the New Normal in the Creative Sector

The creative industry is on the cusp of an AI revolution, signaling a paradigm shift in how content is created, distributed, and monetized. AI’s encroachment into the realm of stock photography is just the tip of the iceberg. The tech is not just knocking at the door; it’s ready to redesign the house.

Stock Visuals Revolution: AI’s Impact on Photography and Video

Stock photography is undergoing a seismic transformation thanks to AI. Traditional methods of curating photo libraries are becoming obsolete as AI algorithms start to produce customizable, high-resolution images with ease. This shift is not just about efficiency; it’s about the fundamental change in content creation. Photographers who have relied on the income from stock image sales face an uncertain future, as AI-generated visuals gain traction and popularity.

The creative industry is now hunting for talent that can straddle the line between creativity and AI expertise, promising a new career horizon for the creatively tech-savvy.

The revolution doesn’t stop at still images. Stock video, too, is entering a new era with advancements like the AI tool SORA, which is set to redefine the creation of lifelike stock video footage. SORA enables the generation of realistic video content with the simplicity of entering a text prompt, mirroring the ease of creating AI-generated images. This groundbreaking technology means that producing high-quality, bespoke stock video can now be as straightforward as typing a description, making it accessible to a wider range of creators and reducing the reliance on extensive filming setups.

With AI tools like SORA, the barriers to creating professional-grade visual content are being dismantled. This development heralds a future where the speed, cost, and ease of generating stock visuals are dramatically improved, potentially saturating the market with AI-generated content. For professionals in the field, this means adapting to a rapidly evolving landscape where AI’s role is increasingly central, not just as a tool but as a creator in its own right.

Design and Visual Arts: AI as the New Norm in Creative Tools

In the sphere of design and visual arts, AI is not just an external force but is increasingly integrated into the fabric of tools that artists and designers use daily. Software like Adobe Photoshop, which revolutionized the industry as a disruptive technology, is now embracing AI to further enhance its capabilities. This integration represents a full-circle moment for digital art tools, evolving from groundbreaking innovations to indispensable assets in the creative workflow.

Photoshop, once a pioneer for digital artistry, is now seen as an essential tool, embedded deeply in the creative process of most artists and designers. Its journey from disruption to indispensability illustrates the transformative impact of technology in the arts. Today, AI features in Photoshop and similar tools are streamlining complex processes, from automating routine tasks to generating intricate design elements, thus allowing artists to focus on the creative aspects of their work.

Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen’s perspective on AI integration underscores this evolution: “To us, it’s about innovating across the framework of data, models, and applications. Because AI is only as good as the data on which it’s trained, our rich data draws upon the investments as well as the expertise across creativity, documents, and customer experience management.” This statement highlights the symbiotic relationship between AI and creative tools, where the strength of AI is harnessed through the vast data and expertise accumulated over years of innovation in the creative sector.

The use of AI in tools like Photoshop signifies a broader trend in the arts and design community, where AI is becoming a fundamental component of the creative process. By integrating AI, these tools are not only becoming more powerful but also more intuitive, enabling artists and designers to push the boundaries of creativity. This evolution reflects a growing trend where AI is not seen as a replacement for human creativity but as an amplifier, enhancing the ability of artists and designers to realize their visions with newfound speed and precision.

The Written Word Reimagined: AI’s Growing Role in Content Creation

In the domain of writing and content creation, AI is not just making waves; it’s creating a new ocean of possibilities. The technology’s ability to generate coherent, contextually relevant text is revolutionizing the way content is produced. From drafting analytical reports to weaving intricate narratives, AI tools are proving to be invaluable allies for writers, enhancing efficiency and sparking creativity.

The infiltration of AI into the writing sector is epitomized by a recent study from The Associated Press, which found that nearly 70% of newsroom staffers are now using generative AI to create content. This statistic is more than a trend; it’s a testament to the fundamental shift in how news is produced and consumed. AI’s role in reshaping newsroom roles and workflow is profound, signaling a transformation in the journalism industry that could redefine the very nature of news reporting.

Despite the technological boon, this shift is not without its ethical quandaries. The burgeoning use of AI in content creation raises significant concerns about authorship, authenticity, and the potential for misinformation. As AI-generated content becomes more pervasive, distinguishing between human and machine-generated narratives becomes increasingly challenging, necessitating stringent checks and balances to ensure credibility and accuracy.

Moreover, the impact of AI on employment within the writing industry cannot be ignored. While AI can augment the capabilities of human writers and streamline content production, there is apprehension about the potential displacement of jobs. The balance between leveraging AI for productivity gains and preserving the unique value of human creativity and insight is delicate and requires careful navigation.

In this evolving landscape, the future of writing and content creation is poised to be a collaborative synergy between human ingenuity and AI efficiency. The challenge lies in harnessing the power of AI to enhance the storytelling process while maintaining the ethical standards and personal touch that define quality journalism and creative writing. As the industry adapts to these changes, the role of writers may evolve, but the core essence of storytelling — to convey meaning, evoke emotion, and inform — remains steadfastly human.

Final Thoughts

With AI’s ascendancy, the specter of job displacement looms large. Yet, it’s not all doom and gloom. The narrative is complex: as some roles diminish, new ones emerge. The creative industry is now hunting for talent that can straddle the line between creativity and AI expertise, promising a new career horizon for the creatively tech-savvy.

The integration of AI into creative processes isn’t just a technical leap; it’s an ethical minefield. From copyright issues to the authenticity of AI-generated art, the sector is grappling with dilemmas that could shape its very ethos. The need for ethical guidelines and authenticity in AI-generated content is more pressing than ever.

AI’s foray into the creative domain is rewriting the industry’s rulebook. This isn’t about machines versus humans; it’s about how the creative sector can harness AI to unlock unprecedented possibilities while preserving the intrinsic value of human creativity. In the face of AI’s relentless march, the creative world must strike a delicate balance between embracing technological advancements and upholding the sanctity of human artistry.

Ditching the Subscription Shackles: My Switch to Affinity and DaVinci

Adobe’s Creative Suite has dominated the graphic design and video editing scene for years, a veritable colossus whose tools were deemed indispensable by creatives worldwide. Yet, as more software giants pivot to subscription models, a growing wave of digital artisans, myself included, are questioning the wisdom of renting our digital paintbrushes and film reels ad infinitum. Seeking liberation from the perpetual outflow of subscription fees, my journey for an alternative led me to the promising lands of Affinity Suite for graphics and DaVinci Resolve for video editing. Here’s a recount of my digital exodus and the newfound freedom found in the embrace of perpetual licenses.

Subscription Fatigue and the Creative’s Dilemma

The tech world’s pivot to subscription models is hardly breaking news. Giants argue it’s the golden path to an evergreen software utopia, where users frolic in the latest updates and security patches. Yet, this model often feels more like a velvet-rope club, where the price of admission is a never-ending drip from your bank account. For freelancers and small studios navigating the razor’s edge of budgeting, the subscription model is a pill that’s become increasingly hard to swallow.

Enter Affinity Suite, with its trio of heroes: Affinity Photo, Designer, and Publisher. These tools don’t just stand toe-to-toe with their Adobe counterparts; they dance around them, offering a seamless transition for those used to the Adobe ecosystem but with a financial model that’s refreshingly straightforward—a single purchase, and it’s yours forever. Diving into Affinity felt like breaking free from chains I never knew were holding me back, providing all the firepower I needed for my graphic exploits without the looming dread of the next billing cycle.

On the video front, DaVinci Resolve has emerged as nothing short of a revolution. Renowned for its color grading prowess, this suite extends its dominion over editing, visual effects, and audio post-production, challenging the status quo with a dual-tiered model: a robust free version and a feature-packed Studio version available for a one-off fee. This approach doesn’t just undercut the subscription model—it flips the table, offering unparalleled value and the freedom to scale up as your projects demand, not as your subscription dictates.

For freelancers and small studios navigating the razor’s edge of budgeting, the subscription model is a pill that’s become increasingly hard to swallow.

The Perks of Permanence

Making the switch wasn’t merely a financial calculus; it was a declaration of independence. Owning my software outright liberates my creative process from the constraints of subscription servitude, ensuring that the tools of my trade are always at my disposal, irrespective of my subscription status or financial flux. It’s a model that not only suits my pocketbook but aligns with a broader pushback against the ephemeral nature of digital ownership, planting a flag for the value of permanence in a fleeting digital landscape.

Wrapping Up

My migration from Adobe Creative Suite to Affinity Suite and DaVinci Resolve is more than a personal pivot—it’s a microcosm of a larger shift within the creative community. As we grapple with the realities of the digital age, the question of how we access and own the tools of our trade has never been more pertinent. For those of us yearning for a return to software sovereignty, Affinity and DaVinci aren’t just alternatives; they’re harbingers of a possible future where the power to create is unshackled from the constraints of continuous payment. In this new dawn, we’re not just users; we’re owners, and that makes all the difference.